After the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, East China's Zhejiang province, and the United Nations General Assembly session in New York, it's time to think how Beijing can help reform global governance further.

China has taken many proactive measures in recent years that the international community responded well to, but it could now go the extramile and turn the new project-based initiatives into institutional organizations based in China under the UN framework.

The world is becoming multi-polar and China has become an influential player, contributing hugely to global growth. And because the West is not sincere about keeping its promise of allowing China to play a bigger role on the world stage, China has taken (and has to further take) more proactive measures to propel globalization. Global governance today does not fully reflect China's true global role because most of the important international cooperation, security, trade and financial institutions are located either in the United States or Europe.

The UN, International Monetary Fund and World Bank are headquartered in the US, and Americans have always held the World Bank president's post. The UN has another headquarters in Geneva, Switzer-land, where the World Trade Organization and many other international institutions are based. Paris, Vienna, Rome, Bonn and other European cities are home to international organizations that coordinate cross-border educational, cultural, scientific, food safety and climate change issues.

As for Asia, which has the biggest share of the world's population and has been driving global growth for some time, the UN has set up just an economic and social council in Thailand and a university in Japan.

For years, China has been taking active part in UN programs to reduce poverty, and increase regional connectivity, South-South cooperation and sustainable development.

This valuable experience, along with its know-how and experience in such fields, can help China establish institutional organizations under the UN framework.

This is not to say that international organizations should be relocated to China but to suggest that the UN consider setting up offices in China to give shape to new ideas. For example, after the UN Development Programme and China signed a memorandum of understanding on the Belt and Road Initiative during Premier Li Keqiang's visit to New York to attend the UN General Assembly, the two sides should consider establishing a new platform to help more countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road to join the initiative and turn it into a truly global endeavor.

Besides, China's top universities are now training some future global leaders. Peking University has set up a South-South cooperation institute this year, Tsinghua University recently launched a project for global young leaders with a huge donation from an American national, and Beijing Normal University has established a G20 anti-corruption research center.

The UN should take notice of these developments and contemplate setting up a university in China that focuses on nurturing talents for the developing world. The newly established institute in Peking University, for instance, could be expanded to serve this purpose. But ideally, a UN university to boost South-South cooperation should not be in Beijing but in western China, because it will also help China develop in a balanced way.

China and the developed economies are now forging partnerships to help less-developed countries expedite their infrastructure construction in order to fight poverty. This so-called third-party cooperation sounds promising, for it will bring together all the advantages of the global economic chain.

Such endeavors demand more research and coordination platforms. So to realize the UN's Agenda for Sustainable Development by 2030, the UN and Beijing should also consider establishing a new office in the country to bring China, and the developed as well as less-developed countries together for global good.

The author is deputy chief of China Daily European Bureau

fujing@chinadaily.com.cn

(China Daily 09/27/2016 page9)