日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
World / Asia-Pacific

UN International Court had no role in Philippines case

By Wang Qingyun (China Daily) Updated: 2016-07-15 08:24

The International Court of Justice rushed to dispel the myth that it was involved in the South China Sea arbitration case filed by the Philippines, just as the United Nations made a similar online clarification.

The ICJ, the UN's principal organ of justice, issued a notice on its website that it is "a totally distinct institution" from the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which offered secretarial assistance to the Arbitral Tribunal that ruled on the case. The ICJ said it "has had no involvement in" that case.

It pointed out that it has posted no information about the case on its website and said that anyone seeking such information must refer to the PCA's website.

On Wednesday, the UN said on its Sina Weibo micro blog that it "has nothing to do with" the PCA, though the ICJ is located in the Peace Palace in The Hague, as is the PCA.

Foreign Ministry spokesman LuKang said on Thursday that these clarifications "show there is no legitimacy or representativeness to how the temporary tribunal was composed and operated, as well as show that its so-called ruling has no authority or credibility at all, and is totally invalid and not binding.

"It seems that this also is the reason why after this illegal ruling came out, only three or four countries wishfully claimed that it was 'legally binding'," Lu said.

Zhao Jianwen, a researcher at the Institute of International Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the reason the UN and the ICJ made such statements is that they "want to stay clear" of the ruling in the arbitration case, which, as Zhao said quoting Vice-Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin, might become "a notorious case".

Zhao said "All of the tribunal's expenses were paid by the Philippines, including its arbitrators' wages, and these experts' opinions are not neutral". Also, the tribunal has no substantive relation with the PCA, he added.

The only relation between them is that the PCA offered secretarial service to the tribunal and the tribunal was held in the PCA's hall, Zhao explained.

Zhao pointed out that the Arbitral Tribunal was a temporary one set up specially for proceeding the South China Sea case, and its work was "virtually done" once the ruling was issued.

wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
Most Popular
Hot Topics

...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 丁香六月天婷婷 | 爱射综合| 四虎www.| 国产黄色片视频 | 天天草天天爽 | 女人久久| 国产a视频 | 欧美日韩成人一区 | 深爱五月网 | 日韩一级一级 | 91成人免费网站 | 在线黄色av | 神马香蕉久久 | 国产精品每日更新 | 香蕉国产在线 | 久久中文娱乐网 | 国产又粗又猛又爽又 | 日韩一区二区三区在线播放 | 午夜一区二区三区在线观看 | 午夜爱爱影院 | 久久精品视频免费看 | 久久爱www | 黄色国产网站 | 三级黄色片网站 | 九九五月天 | 一本到在线视频 | 91视频在线看| 亚洲午夜在线播放 | 青青青草视频 | 麻豆国产原创 | 国产精品久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 在线观看 | 欧美激情一区二区三区 | 久色视频在线 | 国产精品伦 | 在线欧美一区 | 久久精品99国产精 | 手机看片国产福利 | 精品永久| 日本成人中文字幕 | 国产精品黄色 |