McLaren dismayed by FIA charge in spy case
(Reuters)Updated: 2007-07-13 09:15
LONDON, July 12 - Formula One's 'spy saga' took on new momentum on Thursday when the governing body charged McLaren with unauthorised possession of confidential Ferrari information.
The International Automobile Federation (FIA) said in a statement that representatives of the team had been asked to appear before an extraordinary meeting of the World Motor Sport Council in Paris on July 26.
The FIA charged that between March and July the championship leaders had "unauthorised possession of documents and confidential information belonging to Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro".
The March date is earlier than had previously been suspected, raising a question mark over the entire first half of the season.
The statement added that the information included data that could have been "used to design, engineer, build, check, test, develop and/or run a 2007 Ferrari Formula One car".
The FIA referred specifically to article 151c of the International Sporting Code, which refers to "any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motor sport generally".
If McLaren are found guilty, possible sanctions range from a reprimand to disqualification.
The team, with Spain's double world champion Fernando Alonso and Britain's Lewis Hamilton, are 25 points clear of Ferrari in the constructors' championship after nine races.
COUGHLAN SUSPENDED
The FIA announcement followed an investigation by the governing body after Ferrari revealed that a quantity of their information had been found at the home of a senior McLaren technical employee.
McLaren last week suspended chief designer Mike Coughlan, formally named with his wife Trudy in a High Court hearing on Tuesday.
McLaren issued a statement saying they were 'extremely disappointed" with the FIA charge.
"Whilst McLaren wishes to continue its full co-operation with any
investigation into this matter, it does wish to make it very clear that the
documents and confidential information were only in the possession of one
currently suspended employee on an unauthorised basis," the team said.
| 1 | 2 |  |
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|