日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Ttkexpress vs Jingdong is a contract dispute

China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-23 07:50

Ttkexpress vs Jingdong is a contract dispute

Visitors watch a screen showing smart sorting technologies at a JD.com booth at an expo during World Intelligence Congress in Tianjin, June 30, 2017. [Photo/VCG]

TTKEXPRESS, AN EXPRESS DELIVERY COMPANY, announced on Thursday it is suing its partner Jingdong, one of the largest e-commerce companies in China, claiming it is interfering in its business. Southern Metropolis Daily comments:

Ttkexpress claims Jingdong is trying to restrict it to doing business with only clients designated by Jingdong.

Jingdong operates its own logistics company, as well as 16 contracted express-delivery companies, including Ttkexpress. The other 15 delivery companies have so far not made any similar complaints against Jingdong, which suggests that the e-commerce company is not trying to elbow out all of its contracted express delivery companies, so as to benefit its own delivery company.

The fact is Jingdong's own logistics company, though efficient and reliable in many big cities, still cannot meet all the delivery needs of the company. It has to cooperate with the other express delivery companies, especially to cover the remote areas.

To protect the interests of the consumers as well as its partners, Jingdong is justified in taking measures to minimize the negative influence caused by any of its partners, be they retailers or delivery companies.

Jingdong has said it will "resolutely" respond to the law suit, making the counterclaim that Ttkexpress had broken the contract between them because of the flood of complaints about the poor service provided by Ttkexpress.

There should be clear stipulation of the rights and obligations of Jingdong and the express delivery companies in their contracts, which should serve as the foundation to settle the disputes between the two parties.

The dispute between the two business partners is confined to a breach of contract. Neither the Antiunfair Competition Law nor the Antitrust Law is applicable. It is too early for the Ttkexpress to overstate the routine bickering as a legal case related to unfair competition in an attempt to win the public's sympathy.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美xx孕妇 | 黄色一级片子 | 欧美一级日韩一级 | 伊人综合久久 | 天天综合欧美 | 日韩欧美在线不卡 | 欧美久久久久久久久久久 | 99爱爱视频| 青草全福视在线 | 天堂俺去俺来也www久久婷婷 | 精品国产91乱码一区二区三区 | 日本一区二区在线 | 国产国语对白 | 国产激情视频一区 | 国产精品污视频 | www狠狠干| 国产视频第二页 | 欧美动态图 | 中文av在线播放 | 国产成人精品免费视频 | 视频在线一区二区 | 午夜在线播放视频 | 日韩精品大片 | 久久免费少妇高潮久久精品99 | 极品久久久久久久 | 欧美大片高清免费观看 | 香蕉精品视频在线观看 | 久久中文字幕视频 | 99久久99久久精品国产片果冰 | 国产一级在线观看视频 | 久久人人爽人人爽人人片 | 成人观看网站 | 一级免费av| 欧美福利在线观看 | 免费黄视频在线观看 | 好吊操在线 | 亚洲天堂导航 | www夜夜操 | 国产精品自产拍高潮在线观看 | 一区二区色 | 四虎永久在线精品 |