日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-20 07:48

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaks at the Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing, Dec 22, 2015.[Photo/Xinhua]

A DRAFT AMENDMENT to the 2008 regulation on government information disclosure has been issued by the State Council, China's Cabinet, to solicit public opinions. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

It is praiseworthy that the draft does not shun questions over the increasing public calls for government information and the obligation of government organs to disclose it.

The constant disclosure "tussle" between people who want to know more about local governance and civil servants wary of divulging sensitive information has, in fact, found expression in the making and revision of relevant legal codes.

That explains why the latest draft reiterates the principle that government information disclosure should be the norm and nondisclosure exceptional. For that to have teeth, legislative revisions are needed to clarify what is eligible for disclosure and what is not.

There should be little controversy over the information subject to specially designed laws and regulations that is not to be made public under any circumstances. On the other hand, government information that risks "endangering national security, economic security, and social stability", yet can be disclosed in the appropriate circumstances, is often inaccessible.

The draft amendment is right to clarify that the disclosure, if deemed by same-level local governments as a potential threat to public security and social stability or the implementation of key financial policies, will not have to be made.

The vague wording and the lack of concrete criteria, however, may leave room for government departments not to make public information that they should. What constitutes potential security threats and the same-level governments' authority in deciding what to disclose, is not set out clearly enough to convince people that the right to withhold critical information is not being abused. Public supervision of government may be kept at bay in this way.

Making public government information is now a step that cannot be taken back. The disclosure of government information may be better decided by the top legislative body, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, rather than the governments themselves.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产午夜网站 | 黄色福利在线观看 | 天堂网在线观看视频 | 日韩一区二区视频在线 | 天天拍天天干 | 九月婷婷综合 | 久草福利在线观看 | 91av麻豆 | 综合成人| 欧美日韩精品免费观看 | 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁喷水 | 亚洲人在线观看 | 欧美一级淫片免费视频魅影视频 | 久久综合久久综合久久综合 | 麻豆精品一区二区 | 综合网婷婷 | 毛片网站网址 | xxxx日韩 | 成年人视频在线观看免费 | 成人黄色a | 美日韩av在线 | 久久99精品久久久久 | 国产日韩一级片 | 99久久99久久精品国产片果冻 | 亚洲在线日韩 | 成人在线免费看 | 日韩精品在线免费 | a天堂在线视频 | 免费观看一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久久久成人 | 91久久综合亚洲鲁鲁五月天 | 亚洲国产系列 | 四虎成人永久免费视频 | 日韩精品一线二线三线 | 国产亚洲精品成人 | 色欧美片视频在线观看 | 亚洲另类色图 | 日本一级大毛片a一 | 中文字幕自拍 | 日韩毛片儿 | 手机看片1024日韩 |