日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Opinion Line

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

(China Daily) Updated: 2016-09-13 07:53

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

People flock to the cherry blossom garden in Wuhan University on the first day it began selling tickets in Wuhan city, capital of Central China's Hubei province, March 21, 2014. [Photo/icpress.cn]

THE MAIN TEACHING BUILDING OF Wuhan University in Central China's Hubei province was demolished with explosives on Friday. Media reports quoted local officials as saying they demolished the building as it spoiled the scenic surroundings of nearby East Lake. Southern Metropolis Daily commented:

The building, designed by architect He Jingtang, was built in 1997 at the cost of 100 million yuan ($14.9 million) and put into use in 2000. It won several national architecture awards, including the top award for architecture, the Luban Award.

Yet the building was demolished at the cost of 13 million yuan. That's a huge waste of taxpayers' money, because Wuhan University is a public university, funded by the State.

Moreover, the incident is a legal matter. Let's have a look at the nation's Circular Economy Promotion Law, which requires urban governments and the owners of buildings to take measures to maintain them and lengthen their service life. The law also forbids local governments to demolish buildings within their service lives unless it is in the public's interest.

Obviously, demolishing the university building breaks the law. In order to defend themselves, the officials offered the excuse that the building was so high that it exceeded the height limits for buildings around the East Lake. They even said that the building has "ruined the scenery of East Lake".

That's a rather weak excuse and a ridiculous defense. As early as the 1980s, East Lake was listed in the national plan for ecological tourism, and the building was constructed later than that. If the building went against that plan, why did the officials not intervene when they started building it? Why were they silent in 1996 and then have the building demolished 20 years later?

Officials in Wuhan now face a dilemma. If they insist the demolished building had problems, the officials who approved its construction in 1996 should be held answerable. If the building did not break any planning restrictions and there was no justification for the demolition, those who decided to demolish it should pay for their deeds. Something illegal has happened and taxpayers' money has been wasted, and we hope to make clear who is responsible.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 91日韩欧美| 黄色大片在线 | 国产欧美日韩中文字幕 | 欧美国产日韩视频 | 久久噜噜色综合一区二区 | 操女人逼视频 | 五月婷av| 最新国产网址 | 国产一区二区三区视频 | 国产极品一区 | 国产精品一区二区视频 | 成人天堂噜噜噜 | 美国黄色a级片 | 欧美黄色录像视频 | 午夜精品久久久久久久99 | 日韩中文字幕av | 亚洲区中文字幕 | 国产精品二三区 | 69xxx免费视频 | 久久免费视频6 | 成人国产在线视频 | 欧美精品一二三 | 天天干天天色天天 | 日本国产高清 | 欧美在线色 | 18av在线视频| 狠狠干中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美在线免费观看 | 超碰免费公开在线 | 色偷偷超碰 | 成年人免费在线观看视频网站 | jizz高潮| 超碰黑人 | 国产一区二区福利 | 99热免费| 激情五月色播 | 欧洲亚洲自拍 | 日韩在线播放视频 | 99re在线视频播放 | 天堂综合网久久 | 亚洲永久视频 |