日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

War of words set for showdown

Updated: 2012-02-01 08:59

By Jiang Xueqing, Wang Yan and Mei Jia (China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small

War of words set for showdown

When Mai apologized to Han on Jan 18, admitting he didn't have sufficient evidence, Fang joined the fray, saying he noticed Han had deleted all his articles from December 2006 to September 2007 from his blog.

"Posting a reward to look for evidence, while at the same time destroying the proof, makes people feel his claims of innocence lack sincerity," Fang said on his micro blog.

Fang also questioned Han's ability to write such mature works at a young age and to write well enough to win a national composition writing contest in 1999. Fang also alleged that Han's father, writer Han Renjun, is the most likely suspect as young Han's ghostwriter.

Han Han responded by saying the articles were deleted in 2008 at the request of his publishing house and to protect his copyright interest. He also said it was impossible for him and his father to have the same writing style.

Han Renjun also posted online his own works that were published around the same time as Han's first novel, Triple Door, so readers could compare the styles. He also said he did not know any judges to manipulate the writing contest won by his son.

Triple Door was published in May 2000 and is said to have sold more than 2 million copies. Han Han, who failed his college entrance exam, also has written other novels and essays that were published and has won numerous fans among the younger generation.

Fighting words

About Fang's accusation, Han said: "Fang said I must have falsely claimed some stories were mine while they were actually written by someone else, but he can't prove it.

"He also pointed fingers at my friends and some media organizations who criticized him for being unfair, saying that he will fix them one by one. Obviously, he has shown actual malice."

Fang replied: "My accusation is based on my analysis of his early works and some contradictory explanations about these works made by him and his father. This is justified freedom of speech and freedom of academic discussion.

"You can disagree with my conclusion and analysis, but you can't say I intended to make a false charge against him."

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久激情五月 | 国产一级性生活片 | 狠狠躁日日躁夜夜躁2022麻豆 | 天天操妹子| 国产一级淫片久久久片a级 香港之夜完整在线观看 | 91午夜视频在线观看 | 成人手机在线播放 | 国产精品久久久久久久久久免费看 | 色呦呦一区 | 性做久久久久久久久 | 可以免费看黄色的网站 | 亚洲精品v| 一区二区三区蜜桃 | 国产另类在线 | 欧美日韩aaa | 日本丰满少妇黄大片在线观看 | 九九热免费 | 五月琪琪| 日本高清一二三区 | 天天看毛片| 免费视频二区 | 久久久午夜影院 | 精品色综合 | 欧美在线看片 | 国产精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 久久精品在线视频 | 国产在线视频网 | 日韩欧美在线观看 | 精品国产乱子伦 | 国产黄色在线看 | 亚洲成人免费 | 亚洲无限看 | 国内精品99| 日韩中文字幕亚洲 | 日韩一级免费视频 | 国产一区精品在线观看 | 日韩欧美福利 | 国产精品九九九九九九 | 国内视频一区 | 色网站视频 | 麻豆av免费看 |