日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Top Stories

UN International Court had no role in Philippines case

By Wang Qingyun | China Daily | Updated: 2016-07-15 08:24

The International Court of Justice rushed to dispel the myth that it was involved in the South China Sea arbitration case filed by the Philippines, just as the United Nations made a similar online clarification.

The ICJ, the UN's principal organ of justice, issued a notice on its website that it is "a totally distinct institution" from the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which offered secretarial assistance to the Arbitral Tribunal that ruled on the case. The ICJ said it "has had no involvement in" that case.

It pointed out that it has posted no information about the case on its website and said that anyone seeking such information must refer to the PCA's website.

On Wednesday, the UN said on its Sina Weibo micro blog that it "has nothing to do with" the PCA, though the ICJ is located in the Peace Palace in The Hague, as is the PCA.

Foreign Ministry spokesman LuKang said on Thursday that these clarifications "show there is no legitimacy or representativeness to how the temporary tribunal was composed and operated, as well as show that its so-called ruling has no authority or credibility at all, and is totally invalid and not binding.

"It seems that this also is the reason why after this illegal ruling came out, only three or four countries wishfully claimed that it was 'legally binding'," Lu said.

Zhao Jianwen, a researcher at the Institute of International Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the reason the UN and the ICJ made such statements is that they "want to stay clear" of the ruling in the arbitration case, which, as Zhao said quoting Vice-Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin, might become "a notorious case".

Zhao said "All of the tribunal's expenses were paid by the Philippines, including its arbitrators' wages, and these experts' opinions are not neutral". Also, the tribunal has no substantive relation with the PCA, he added.

The only relation between them is that the PCA offered secretarial service to the tribunal and the tribunal was held in the PCA's hall, Zhao explained.

Zhao pointed out that the Arbitral Tribunal was a temporary one set up specially for proceeding the South China Sea case, and its work was "virtually done" once the ruling was issued.

wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

 

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人免费看片视频在线观看 | 国产不卡免费视频 | 日韩在线视频网址 | 日韩中文字幕精品 | 国产在线视频一区二区三区 | 成人9ⅰ免费影视网站 | 色综合88 | a黄色大片 | www四虎com| 毛片视频网 | 久久大陆 | se婷婷| 久久国产一区 | 国产一级免费av | 日韩欧美网站 | 99久久九九| 深夜福利网站在线观看 | 人人天天夜夜 | 狠狠欧美 | 深夜视频在线播放 | jzzijzzij亚洲成熟少妇 | 中文字幕在线观看视频免费 | 日韩中文字幕在线观看视频 | 成人免费看片在线观看 | 久久婷婷丁香 | 啪啪自拍视频 | 九九午夜| 国产精品国产三级国产普通话蜜臀 | 91亚洲视频在线观看 | 国产 欧美 在线 | 青草视频在线 | 亚洲一区在线播放 | 精品中文字幕在线观看 | 高清av免费| 久久草草 | 久久久久在线视频 | 99久久久久成人国产免费 | 在线免费观看av片 | 色婷婷精品视频 | 中文字幕av免费 | japanese在线播放 |