日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Stand shoulder to shoulder with CE

Updated: 2013-01-17 06:02

By Chan Wai-keung(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Having formulated a comprehensive framework on a wide range of livelihood issues, Chief Executive CY Leung's maiden policy address seems to have been at once visionary and pragmatic, cutting across almost all sides of the social spectrum.

In touching on so many social ills, it is equally admirable for Leung's policy address to highlight his strategies for housing and land supply, the most pressing issue in the eyes of Hong Kong people. Having profound sympathy for the underprivileged residing in tiny, subdivided flats or cubicle, Leung once again shows his true grit to lead them out of the housing predicaments at any cost.

To be sure, Leung's policy address, in contrast to those of the previous administration, has taken many bold and decisive steps to tackle many longstanding and entrenched issues in Hong Kong. These daring moves include the offer of over 22,000 Public Rental Housing flats per year, conversion of Global International Credit (GIC) and other government sites to housing development, change of 13 sites in green belt areas to residential use, large-scale new development projects in the New Territories (NT) to increase land supply, allocation of HK$10 billion as subsidies to phase our polluting diesel commercial vehicles, delegation of administrative work and responsibilities to district councils. More commendable are other innovative ideas proposed by the address, such as the pilot scheme on community care service voucher for the elderly, and rock cavern and underground space development.

Yet, it is naive and unrealistic to expect that there is a silver bullet or quick panacea that will solve all the thorny problems of Hong Kong. As the gist of the policy address has stated: " The deep-seated problems of Hong Kong cannot be solved overnight. But, we need to take the first step to deal with them...The government is determined to deliver results. We must act with one heart and one vision to tackle these problems."

While Leung has mapped out some well-thought out strategies for long-term challenges, the next daunting task facing his administration is whether they can resolve the conflicts between groups of vested interests involved with government plans. For example, in considering whether a site should be developed, the government of course will accommodate conflicting views and strive to balance different interests. But, in reality, it is impossible to reach a full consensus over any issues in any pluralistic society. Faced with the fierce opposition from some self-serving but powerful groups, will the government really have "the courage and resolve to make hard choices and decisions" in the best interest of the whole community as CY Leung has suggested in his policy address?

Arguably, the current housing problems and shortage of land supply to a great extent stemmed from the illicit use of vast tracts of the NT by the indigenous inhabitants and, above all, the fallout of the small-house policy. Last year, one government minister once showed a willingness to have a rethink on the continuity of small-house policy in a bid to increase their land supply. However, daunted by an ferocious outcry from thousands of self-centered indigenous habitants, she immediately backed off and turned silent. So far, the government has demonstrated scant fortitude to stand up to Heung Yee Kuk, a staunch defender of small house policy.

Likewise, the conversion of GIC and other government sites to residential use in Kowloon are very often thwarted by some narrow-minded and self-seeking district councilors. A few years ago, the authorities sensibly proposed building a public estate on the seaside of Sham Shui Po to alleviate the housing problem in Kowloon. Sadly, to pander to their middle class voters with "not-in-my backyard syndrome", some Sham Shui Po district councilors strongly disapproved of the plan. Bowing to the immense pressure from the district council, the authorities were woefully compelled to shelve such a desirable housing plan.

Therefore, as CY Leung has rightly argued in his policy address, the government has "feasible plans for increasing land supply, but the only crucial question is whether we can stand united with one vision". Extensive land development takes decades. Surly, most of the Leung's strategies for housing and land supply are intended for our future needs. It is too easy for NT indigenous inhabitants, Heung Yee Kuk, and district councilors to shun or even oppose new land development out of short-term self-interest. But, bear in mind that their short-sighted opposition will inflict lasting housing anguish on our future generations.

In the past, it was without full public support that the government dithered on taking on groups of vested interests who are indifferent to our housing plight. Therefore, it is time for us to stand shoulder to shoulder with CY Leung administration to confront these selfish bullies.

The author is a Lecturer at the CPCE, Hong Kong Polytechnic University and a former Scouloudi Fellow at London University.

(HK Edition 01/17/2013 page3)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品永久免费 | 日本不卡一区二区三区 | 成人毛片在线精品国产 | 久久久久久久久97 | 成人av免费看 | 久操av | 精品国产乱码 | 中文字幕精品久久久 | 91av手机在线 | 日韩免费在线视频 | 精品久久久久久久久久久aⅴ | 欧美xx孕妇| 91热热| 日韩欧美一级片 | 狠狠狠狠狠狠干 | 久久综合狠狠 | 亚洲色图自拍 | 亚洲精品偷拍视频 | 香蕉视频在线观看网站 | 免费观看中文字幕 | 综合久久色 | 欧美妞干网 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区不卡 | 91黄页| 日韩福利在线 | 免费在线性爱视频 | 日本精品视频在线播放 | 国产在线精品一区 | 我要看一级黄色录像 | 久久久观看 | 另类自拍 | 国产精品又黄又爽又色 | 玖玖在线观看 | 欧美日韩视频网站 | 亚洲色图欧洲色图 | 久操视频网 | 国产成人精品一区二区三区网站观看 | 波多野结衣99 | 九九99精品| 99视频网 | 久久美女免费视频 |