The Senate voted down a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on Wednesday,
but Republicans planned a vote in the House of Representatives to keep a
national spotlight on the hot-button issue.
Opponents of passage
of federal marriage amendment Jason Bevier (L) and Frank November (R) hold
up a placard during news conference on Capitol Hill to discuss same-sex
marriages June 6, 2006. A constitutional ban on same-sex marriage failed
to pass the U.S. Senate on Wednesday but Republican leaders planned to
take it up in the House, keeping a national spotlight on the divisive
issue. [AP] |
The 49 to 48 Senate vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to clear a
procedural hurdle, thwarting President Bush and the mostly Republican lawmakers
who said the Constitution must be amended to prevent judges from striking down
existing state bans on gay marriage.
Democrats accused Republicans of exploiting a divisive issue they knew would
fail in order to shore up conservative support before November congressional
elections and divert attention from topics like the war in Iraq that reflect
poorly on the party in control of the White House and Congress.
"It is a cynical attempt to score political points by overriding state courts
and intruding into individuals' private lives," Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy
(news, bio, voting record) of Massachusetts said in floor debate on Tuesday.
The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to take up the marriage
amendment in July, though Republican leaders do not expect it to pass there
either.
"This is a big issue for lots of our members and frankly for lots of
Americans," House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio told reporters on
Tuesday.
Constitutional amendments must win approval from two-thirds of each house of
the U.S. Congress and three-quarters of state legislatures before taking effect.
Colorado Republican Sen. Wayne Allard (news, bio, voting record), the bill's
sponsor, did not expect the gay-marriage ban to pass but hoped to demonstrate
increased support since 2004, when 48 senators voted for a similar bill.
Allard and other backers said they were not disappointed that the measure
only won 49 votes this time.
"Clearly as time goes on there will be more votes in favor of this," said
South Dakota Republican Sen. John Thune. "We make a little headway each time
this is debated."
Seven Republicans voted against Allard's bill on Wednesday, including two -
Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record) and New Hampshire
Sen. Judd Gregg (news, bio, voting record), who supported it in 2004.
Specter said he opposes same-sex marriage but would vote against the measure
because it tramples on states' rights.
Two Democrats, Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson (news, bio, voting record) and West
Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd (news, bio, voting record), voted for the gay-marriage
ban.
According to a March 2006 poll by the Pew Research Center, 51 percent of
Americans oppose same-sex marriage, down from 63 percent in February 2004.
Forty-five states have passed laws or amended their constitutions to prohibit
same-sex marriage, and the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act allows states to refuse
to recognize marriages performed elsewhere.
Allard said a constitutional ban is necessary to protect these laws, which in
many cases were enacted with overwhelming public support.
State judges have struck down several state gay-marriage bans and court
challenges are pending in nine states.
Since 2004, about 8,000 gay couples have married in Massachusetts, the only
state to fully recognize same-sex marriages. Six other states and the District
of Columbia offer same-sex couples some legal protections. (Additional reporting
by Joanne Kenen)
