日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

   

Stimulating domestic consumption

By Gao Anming (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-03-21 07:23

For most people, this seems rather like a joke: Xing Pu, a member of the CPPCC Shanghai Committee, proposed last month that the government, fresh from a hefty increase in financial revenue, hand out 1,000 yuan ($142) to each citizen as a subsidy against soaring inflation.

Although the proposal is very like the $168 billion package President George W. Bush signed into law last month that gives each adult US citizen $600 in tax rebate, it has never been heard of in this country before, let alone put it into practice.

For me, such a proposal is not feasible. But it does raise the question, which has sparked heated debate in recent months: should the government cut taxes when its annual revenue growth triples that of the GDP?

In 2007, the government collected 5.13 trillion yuan, representing a yearly increase of 32.4 percent, or a whopping 1.25 billion yuan, and a surplus of 174 billion. In comparison, GDP grew 11.4 percent, and per capita disposable income of urban and rural residents rose 12.2 percent and 9.5 percent respectively, deducting inflation.

For years, the country's GDP has been expanding at double-digit pace, creating a China miracle. But what is more spectacular, however, is that financial revenue has grown by about 10 percentage points more. The per capita income growth of urban and rural residents during the last five years, on the other hand, was 9.8 and 6.8 percent respectively.

The authorities have been painstakingly explaining that China's taxation level is not at all high compared with many countries, advanced or developing. They might be right. But any such argument pales against the fact that the government is taking an increasing share of the newly generated wealth.

Another example constantly cited to underscore the need for a tax cut is stamp duty. The government levied 200.5 billion yuan on securities transactions last year, an astonishing 10-fold increase year-on-year, and 20 billion yuan more than the dividends paid by all the listed companies. The amount nearly equaled that of all such levies imposed during the last 16 years since the opening of the stock market.

As the world's largest developing economy, China does need fat revenues to sustain its "people-first" development, particularly in areas like social security, education, medical care and infrastructure construction. But as it transfers from a planned economy to a market economy, it is necessary for the government to readjust its functions and let market forces play a bigger role. A disproportional swelling of fiscal revenue against economic growth would hinder that process.

This is not a debate between the Keynesians and the supply-siders because even the former would not support public powers to replace the creativeness of businesses and individuals.

Cutting taxes on businesses creates a more favorable environment for them to invest, innovate and employ more people, which would in turn enlarge the tax base and somehow relieve the government from having to spend heavily on services that could be provided by the private sector. It could also help compensate increasing labor costs as a result of government-sponsored programs to protect workers, such as the implementation of the Labor Contract Law.

And cutting individual income tax or further raising the lowest taxable base would mean higher disposable income, which would lead people to spend more. With increasing trade frictions with the United States and the European Union, China has to take concrete measures to stimulate domestic consumption. Tax cuts or rebates should at least be part of the official policy package.

People have been voicing strong discontent against soaring property prices, but not many know that nearly one-third of those prices consist of taxes and fees. If the government levies less on the developers, who have been demonized recently by angry house buyers, property prices might well fall.

Tax cuts would also push the government to exercise more restraint in formulating fiscal policies. Budgetary discipline is crucial for any government, and in China, the problem is just as pressing. A scene that many lavish buildings are often government offices betrays the fact that there is much room for budgetary control.

E-mail: gaoanming@chinadaily.com.cn

(China Daily 03/21/2008 page8)



Hot Talks
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美一级大片免费看 | 日韩第六页 | 国产高清二区 | 色综合免费 | 欧美日韩字幕 | 久久婷婷成人综合色 | 成年人在线免费观看视频网站 | 成人在线免费视频 | 亚洲一级精品 | 色播五月综合 | 伊人久久大香线蕉成人综合网 | 欧美v日韩 | 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽视频 | 99热99re6国产在线播放 | 裸体男女树林做爰 | 亚洲一区二区在线观看视频 | 成人一区二区三区四区 | 中文字幕国产在线观看 | 国产女人18毛片水真多 | 极品在线| 91最新网址 | 欧美中文字幕 | 天天摸日日 | 欧美精品在线免费观看 | 欧美一级全黄 | 手机看片在线观看 | 黑人巨大精品欧美黑寡妇 | 国产一区二区三区网站 | 日本久久久久久久久 | 天天操天天干天天舔 | 国产欧美三级 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频网站 | 日本一区二区三区在线观看视频 | 免费福利视频在线观看 | 国产一级片免费 | av在线播放国产 | 粉嫩av一区二区夜夜嗨 | 日本国产欧美 | 亚洲香蕉中文网 | 国产一区二区三区在线看 | 香蕉视频网站在线 |