As is well known, Japan's relations with its neighbours hit a brick wall from
time to time owing to Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's repeated
visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, which honours Japan's war dead, including 14
Class-A war criminals.
Voices from inside Japan are getting louder, urging Koizumi to stop visiting
the shrine and handle relations with China and South Korea in a reasonable
manner.
Koizumi alleges that he visits the shrine on a personal basis, and that this
has nothing to do with diplomacy. Moreover, he has tried to drag the United
States into the dispute, claiming that Washington has never criticized his
Yasukuni Shrine visits.
Now comes a telling blow. Henry Hyde, chairman of the US House of
Representatives International Relations Committee, in his letter to House
Speaker Dennis Hastert, asked Koizumi to promise a stop to his visits to the
shrine before addressing the US Congress in June.
Without this assurance, Koizumi's visit to Capitol Hill would dishonour the
place where Franklin Roosevelt made his "day of infamy" speech after the
Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, wrote Hyde.
For the generation that remembers Pearl Harbour, a visit by Koizumi to
Yasukuni soon after a speech to the US Congress would be an affront, he said.
What lies behind Koizumi's shrine visits is the fact that Japan's political
status in the world political arena does not match its economic power, which has
been caused by Japan's historical legacy of aggression against other Asian
nations before and during World War II.
Nobody wants to deny Japan the status of a normal country. But the
Koizumi-fashioned road of forceful breakthrough leads in the wrong direction.
Not a single Asian country that was overrun by Japanese imperial troops wishes
to see Japan forever worn down by its historical liabilities. But in the face of
a neighbour who refuses to repent for his past bad deeds and gets increasingly
pushy, people cannot help but worry that Japan is treading on its old militarist
road.
It is Koizumi's behaviour that suggests that Japan is deviating from its
post-war road of peaceful development and, therefore, makes Japan look
increasingly abnormal.
True, the United States wants Japan to play a role in Asia akin to that
played by the United Kingdom in other world political sectors. But this does not
necessarily mean the US Government would tolerate behaviour from Koizumi that
greatly strains Japan's relations with its Asian neighbours, behaviour that
threatens to tip the strategic balance in Asia and, therefore, harms the
interests of the United States.
Koizumi and his followers, however, will not easily give up their shrine
visits despite the clear signal sent by Hyde. This is because visits to the
Yasukuni Shrine are not merely a matter of "belief." They are also part of the
strategy of realizing Japan's dream of becoming a major power.
This kind of extreme stubbornness at all diplomatic costs actually stems from
an astute strategic calculation and, therefore, in my opinion, would not be
given up easily.
Will Hyde's points go totally unheeded and become meaningless? This author
believes that his words will have an impact in four respects.
First, Hyde has warned Koizumi over his rash behaviour, which is based on a
wrong historical outlook, on the eve of the latter's US visit.
In this context, it is easy to imagine that Koizumi would be unable to
command the sympathy of the majority of his Capitol Hill audience, who are
reluctant to see the excessive worsening of big-country relations in East Asia,
if he harps on about Japan getting close to the United States at the expense of
its relations with its Asian neighbours.
Second, the connection Hyde made in his letter between Franklin Roosevelt's
"day of infamy" speech at Capitol Hill immediately after Japanese warplanes
attacked Pearl Harbour and Koizumi's possible visit to the Yasukuni Shrine soon
after he visits the US Congress has historical allusions.
Would this conjure up images of Japanese troops running amok in Asia and the
Pacific? People are likely to ask if Japan would shed the "cloak of peace" it
has been wearing since its defeat in World War II, given that Japan's status in
the US-Japanese alliance is being continuously enhanced and it is gaining much
more military room for manoeuvre around the world?
Third, any voice from US political circles will naturally be projected into
the complex and sensitive Asian geopolitical sector.
Fourth, pluralistic choice on the part of the United States will indirectly
impact the election of the leader of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party.
This would help those Japanese politicians who want Japan's diplomatic
activities to be undertaken in a more reasonable and rational manner.
In the final analysis, however, Asian issues are resolved by Asians. Outside
forces cannot achieve solutions.
China, as an Asian country, should stick to its
principles on such matters as the Japanese leader's shrine visits. This is in
the long-term interests of all Asian countries, including Japan.
The author is a research fellow from the Institute of Japanese Studies
under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
(China Daily 05/31/2006 page4)
