|
CHINA> National
![]() |
|
Mixed reaction to WTO ruling
By Ding Qingfen and Liu Wei (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-08-14 07:00 * The ruling, if approved by WTO, would adversely affect the two importers of foreign films. But other companies hailed the ruling. * It's understandable China takes measures to protect the film industry from being invaded by foreign products, said an associate professor from Beijing Film Academy. China may appeal a ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO) that would break up a monopoly of two State-owned firms as the sole foreign audiovisuals importers. A WTO dispute settlement panel, in a report released yesterday, ruled that China's practices were inconsistent with international trade rules, and that China needs to revise them. The US filed the case two years ago. The case involves publications, audio and video products, and music download services imported by China.
"It is good news for private companies. We would like to join in. The game was unfair, but I believe complete competition is coming," said Wang Zhonglei, president of Huayi Brothers, China's leading privately owned media company. The Chinese government has appointed China Film Group and Huaxia Film Distribution to import and distribute audiovisuals from abroad. This, as the US claimed, has not only run against the fundamental WTO rules requiring equal treatment between local and foreign businesses, but also breached the commitment China made when it joined the WTO to open up sales and distribution. "China has been performing its duty on publications market access, and we have been providing unblocked access to overseas imports of audiovisual products," the Ministry of Commerce said yesterday on its website. "We regret the dispute panel did not turn down the US." China has imported approximately 500,000 titles of publications of all kinds every year since joining the WTO in 2001, as promised in its entry agreement. Under the WTO framework, the US and China must decide within two months whether to appeal any part of the ruling. "We will carefully evaluate the report," the ministry said. The ministry's Department of Treaty and Law, which is responsible for the issue, refused to comment. Lin Xiaoxia, associate professor from Beijing Film Academy, defended China's policies. "Film in China can be hardly a pure commercial product. Its educational and social functions are still important. It's understandable China takes measures to protect the film industry from being invaded by foreign products, especially when ours is still too weak to compete," Lin said. But Tao Jingzhou, a partner of US Jones Day, a leading international law firm, said China has little chance of winning an appeal. The American Chamber of Commerce China also hailed the ruling. |
主站蜘蛛池模板: 麻豆久久久 | 狠狠se| 精品少妇一区二区三区免费观看 | 六月婷婷激情 | 中文字幕日韩视频 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久动 | 有码一区二区三区 | 农村少妇久久久久久久 | 成人午夜免费在线观看 | 极品久久久久久久 | 懂色av蜜臂av粉嫩av | 一级片一级片 | 久久视频精品在线观看 | 999久久久久久久久6666 | www久久久 | 欧美日韩国产精品一区 | 播播网色播播 | 91禁在线| 久久影院国产 | 欧美一级大片在线观看 | 青青免费在线视频 | 国产亚洲视频在线 | 杨思敏毛片 | 日韩在线视频第一页 | 久久午夜国产精品 | 99自拍视频| 免费啪啪小视频 | 久久久一区二区三区 | 青青精品视频 | 麻豆av免费在线观看 | 欧美www| 老地方在线高清观看动漫 | 四虎成人免费影院 | 国产一区二区三区高清 | 黄色录像毛片 | 中文字幕第12页 | 日韩少妇视频 | 国产白丝精品91爽爽久久 | 日韩无遮挡 | 国产精彩视频 | 日本视频网|