The country's first-ever third-party evaluation of judicial credibility found some gaps between a Shanghai court's work and the public's feelings, though its overall performance was considered good.

Disparities mainly lay in the efficiency of enforcing a court order, answering questions after a verdict and making effective responses to petitions and complaints.

The Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences on Tuesday published its report on the performance of the Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court for 2015.