A middle school student tries on a robe during a court's open day activity in Bengbu, Anhui province, on Dec 4. GAO JIANYE / FOR CHINA DAILY

With "tigers" in the dock and reform in the headlines, 2013 may prove to have been a springboard for major change in the justice system, especially in transparency, legal experts say.

Chinese courts heard some of world's most high-profile cases last year — and at the same time tested some very fresh ground.

Judicial authorities nationwide for the first time used micro blogs and other new media to interact with the public, sharing information on verdicts and even real-time reports during trials.

For the trial of former Chongqing Party chief Bo Xilai, one of several high-ranking officials — known as tigers — prosecuted for corruption last year, the court posted updates on Sina Weibo.

A plan was also announced to set courts free of administrative rankings, to better prevent interference from local governments, as well as new guidelines to avoid wrongful convictions.

Attorneys and law professors welcomed the breakthroughs of 2013, but they have also urged the Supreme People's Court to speed up efforts to improve openness and independence.

"Transparency is at the core of any justice system," said Wang Zhenmin, dean of Tsinghua University's School of Law. "Not only does it ensure fair verdicts, but also confidence among the people."

Wang said he was glad to see China's top court shift its focus from quantity and "superficial administrative work" to quality.

"Courts have always been required to be open, but they rarely were," he said, adding that, by comparison, last year he was "surprised how much more information was released about trials and verdicts" by authorities.

Transparency

In November, the Supreme People's Court established a national online database for all verdicts.

Pilot programs were also launched in Shanghai and Zhejiang province to send text message updates about trial dates and times, while a website set up in October details complaints against parties who have failed to abide by a court decision.

To cater to the growing number of Internet users and people who access the Web through smartphones and mobile Internet devices, many courts opened micro blogs and accounts on Wechat, Tencent's instant voice and text messaging service.

On June 26, Beijing High People's Court posted its first message on Sina Weibo, writing that the goal was to "provide an authoritative legal voice" and "improve justice in the city". Today the account has 910,000 followers.

"The number of followers soared after we posted updates of several trials in September," said Zhao Yan, who runs the micro blog, referring to the month in which three high-profile cases were heard, including the prosecution of Beijing airport bomber Ji Zhongxing.

"We'll post real-time updates and verdicts more often," he added.

The Supreme People's Court, which opened an account in November, has about 750,000 followers.

Many of the innovations of 2013 remain at the preliminary stage, although Wang at Tsinghua University suggested some steps could be skipped to speed things up.

"After all," he said, "we've reached an agreement on such things as the need for judicial transparency so the pace of the reform can really be quickened."

Chen Weidong, a law professor at Renmin University of China, agreed and stressed there is a lot of work to be done in 2014 to further improve judicial transparency.

Simple things, such as making it easier for citizens to actually watch trials, still need to be addressed, he said.

Under the current rules, people must apply several days in advance to sit in a court's public gallery, and many are rejected without receiving a clear reason.

"The Supreme People's Court has to improve the way it observes and receives feedback from lower courts, otherwise they risk making any progress in short term," Chen warned.