日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Economy

Demolition rules seek public input

By Wang Huazhong and Wang Jingqiong (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-12-16 09:19
Large Medium Small

New draft reflects resolve to protect people's rights in relocation cases

BEIJING - Local governments will not be allowed to use their administrative rights to forcibly demolish citizens' properties, and forced home demolitions must go through the courts, according to draft proposals released on Wednesday to gauge public opinion.

The proposals, in an updated draft revision to the urban home demolition regulations, were made available for public response until Dec 30. They also prohibit any organization or individual from using violence, threats or other illegal acts, such as cutting off water, electricity and transport access, to force relocations.

The long-awaited new draft, which experts said enhances legal procedures, replaces the first draft, which resulted in 65,601 responses from Jan 29 to March 3.

"It's the first time for the State Council Legislative Affairs Office to publish a second draft of regulations for a second round of soliciting public opinion," Peking University law professor Shen Kui told China Daily.

"It shows the central government's caution in making such a new rule and its determination to curb the violation of people's rights amid a recent string of violent relocation cases."

Shen is one of the five Peking University professors who suggested that the existing urban housing demolition regulations be revised, after Sichuan province native Tang Fuzhen died following self-immolation in protest against the demolition of her home last year.

The existing regulations stipulate that local governments can resort to administrative or judicial means to carry out demolitions. However, government figures show administrative organs forcibly conducted only 0.2 percent of all demolitions.

"Even though very few detrimental incidents have happened during forced demolitions, effective measures must be taken to avoid such incidents from reoccurring," the State Council Legislative Affairs Office said in a public letter on its website alongside the new draft regulations.

"The revision may help restrict or standardize local governments' activities concerning land requisition and compensation," and should help ease disputes over "property requisition and compensation", the letter said.

The country is at a very critical period of industrialization and urbanization, the office said, and the theme of the revision is to balance public and private interests.

The revision also updates articles concerning two key issues in land requisition and home demolition: compensation and how to define projects of public interest.

Related readings:
Demolition rules seek public input Experts urge passage of new demolition rule
Demolition rules seek public input Reform to end violent demolitions
Rules on demolition
Demolition rules seek public input Regulating demolition is urgent concern
Demolition rules seek public input Demolitions not vital for growth

The issue of compensation was the topic the public responded to most during the first round of solicitation, with 13,332 responses, according to the office.

The second revision makes it clear that compensation must not be lower than the market price and evaluation of the property must be done by qualified rating institutions and can be appealed.

Public interest projects also garnered a large feedback with 9,161 responses between January and March. These responses were concerned about the definition of public interest projects. If a property falls under this category it could result in forced demolition.

According to the second revision, the following projects are considered public interest: Government projects involving energy, transport, education, resources and environment protection, disaster relief, social welfare, public service, as well as office building for government agencies.

A number of recent high-profile incidents of forced relocations triggered widespread publicity and growing calls for a revision to the existing regulations, which allow forced relocation before any legal procedures or payment of compensation.

However, little progress had been reported after the first draft revision was made public in January and many scholars had expressed concern that resistance from local governments, whose finances rely heavily on real estate development, impeded the reform process.

Wang Weiguo, a law professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said the reason that the revision takes so long is that it's difficult to balance the interests of the community and individuals.

Wang said he welcomes the new draft making forced relocation only possible after judicial procedure. "Even if it's really a public interest project, necessary judicial procedures should be ahead of forced relocation," he said.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产欧美日韩一区 | 日本黄色高清视频 | 日本成人毛片 | 午夜在线观看影院 | 久久裸体视频 | 一区二区三区国产精品 | 97在线视频免费观看 | 一区在线观看 | 国产精品久久国产精品 | 亚洲视频免费播放 | 国产精品久久成人免费观看 | 中文字幕国产精品 | 国产精品一区在线 | 成年人晚上看的视频 | 亚洲一区二区在线免费 | 国产www在线 | 免费亚洲精品 | 精品一区二区在线观看 | 日韩在线视频观看免费 | 天天干天天草天天射 | 日韩黄页 | 深夜视频在线播放 | 九九九视频 | 亚洲女同视频 | 国产微拍一区 | 亚欧洲精品视频 | 欧美性大战xxxxx久久久 | 国产中文字幕一区二区三区 | 天堂资源站 | 日女人的逼 | 婷婷丁香六月 | 亚洲自拍天堂 | 欧美不卡影院 | 久久成人激情 | 日韩国产在线播放 | 久久伊人精品视频 | 色一区二区| 毛片在线视频 | 午夜精品久久久久久久久久久久 | 麻豆一区二区三区 | 少妇又色又紧又黄又刺激免费 |