日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Jimmy Lai's 'champions' have own agenda: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-12-16 21:59
Share
Share - WeChat

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper's remarks on the conviction of Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, echoed by some other Western politicians and media outlets, once again reveal a familiar pattern: selective outrage, willful ignorance of facts and an attempt to politicize a judicial case that was handled strictly in accordance with the law.

Such reactions are not only irresponsible but also disrespectful to Hong Kong's judicial independence and the basic principles of the rule of law they themselves claim to uphold.

Lai's verdict is the result of a meticulous judicial process that spanned 156 days, examined a vast body of evidence and materialized in an 855-page judgment. The ruling was issued by a panel of three designated judges who carefully analyzed Lai's messages, records of meetings with foreign officials and extensive content published by Apple Daily and related entities.

Every major defense argument was addressed and refuted with detailed and professional reasoning. To issue condemnations almost at the same time on the very day the verdict was announced, as some Western critics did, makes it evident that the stance of these voices was predetermined, as they hadn't had time to study the judgment.

The core of the case is also being deliberately distorted in these baseless condemnations. The ruling is by no means an attack on journalism or press freedom, but a judgment on proven criminal acts. The court made clear that Lai was convicted not for expressing opinions, but for conspiring to collude with external forces, calling for foreign sanctions and publishing seditious materials with the intent of undermining national governance. The judges explicitly identified Lai as the "mastermind" behind these activities, noting that his actions went far beyond legitimate journalistic work.

Calls by some foreign politicians to portray Lai as a "defender of press freedom" ring hollow. Hong Kong is home to a diverse and vibrant media environment, and international media outlets continue to operate in the city. The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region does not target lawful reporting or commentary; it sets clear legal boundaries against acts that endanger national security. Similar boundaries exist in many countries, including those now casting stones. To pretend otherwise is either disingenuous or hypocritical.

Equally misleading are claims that the trial lacked due process or humane treatment. The court proceedings were open and transparent, with multiple foreign diplomats attending as observers. Lai, represented by lawyers, fully exercised his right to defense, and denied all the charges, as is his right. The court repeatedly confirmed that he received proper medical care during detention and that procedural safeguards were in place. Descriptions of the process as "unfair" conveniently ignore these documented facts.

Some critics have also questioned the absence of a jury, ignoring the fact that this arrangement is explicitly provided for under the law. The designated judge mechanism ensures professionalism and consistency in handling complex cases involving national security — again, a practice not uncommon internationally.

What is particularly troubling about the remarks from the UK foreign secretary and others is their open interference in Hong Kong's judicial affairs. The case is a matter for the Hong Kong SAR authorities, which bear a constitutional responsibility to safeguard national security under the "one country, two systems" framework.

These external forces should stop interfering in Hong Kong's judicial affairs and China's internal affairs, stop making the case for anti-China rioters bent on destabilizing Hong Kong, and stop going further down the wrong path.

Lai is by no means a "democracy fighter", but an individual who incited turmoil, glorified street violence, and openly lobbied foreign governments to sanction his own country. He is not a paragon of media ethics at all; his publications thrived on sensationalism, misinformation and social division. Nor is he a model "citizen", given his previous convictions for fraud and other offenses unrelated to national security.

Hong Kong's lawful handling of the Lai case demonstrates its zero-tolerance stance toward acts that endanger national security, while reaffirming the city's commitment to the rule of law. External forces should stop trying to exploit the case for political theater and instead respect the facts, the law and Hong Kong's judicial autonomy.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 狠狠操婷婷| 精品动漫一区二区三区 | 国产露脸无套对白在线播放 | av在线大全 | 久久婷婷激情 | 手机看片日韩福利 | 免费网站观看www在线观 | 日韩亚洲视频 | 久久久精品影视 | 国产精品美女久久久久av爽 | 欧洲精品一区二区三区 | yy6080午夜 | 久久免费资源 | 影音先锋男人资源网 | 伊人22综合| 午夜在线一区二区 | 午夜在线一区二区 | 国产4区 | 99天堂网 | 久久精品在线观看 | 好吊日av | 亚洲最黄网站 | 97se亚洲国产综合在线 | 日本一区二区三区精品 | xxxxx黄色| 精品一区av | 亚洲视频精品 | 久久99操 | 在线观看国产小视频 | 欧美一级片网址 | 丨国产丨调教丨91丨 | 亚洲精品在线视频观看 | 日本久久久久久久 | 一级黄色免费看 | 欧美激情xxxx | 香蕉视频在线免费播放 | 国产精品国产三级国产专区53 | 成年网站在线观看 | 日韩手机在线视频 | 日本一级片在线播放 | 手机免费观看av |