日批在线视频_内射毛片内射国产夫妻_亚洲三级小视频_在线观看亚洲大片短视频_女性向h片资源在线观看_亚洲最大网

US divided over college admissions policy

By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2022-12-12 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat
Students rally outside the US Supreme Court in Washington on Oct 31 before hearings in two cases that could decide the future of affirmative action in college admissions. J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP

Top court hears challenges brought against two universities

National debate in the United States on the role played by race in college admissions culminated with the Supreme Court hearing challenges against two universities.

To create a diverse student body, many colleges and universities in the US consider a student's race as a factor in their admissions process. Such race-conscious policies — known as affirmative action — have been repeatedly upheld by the nation's top court in past decades.

Educators fear a "ripple effect" if the conservative court decides that the affirmative action policy is illegal.

The baseline for permissible affirmative action programs in US higher education was established in 1978.

Citing Harvard University as the model, Justice Lewis Powell said that in evaluating applicants, race could not be the determinative factor, but the university could use race as one of the many factors, just as it uses other traits such as a special talent for music, science or athletics, and even the fact that an applicant's parents attended the university.

In 2016, the Supreme Court upheld an admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin, ruling that the university could continue to consider race as a factor.

This time, the challenges were brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, or UNC, with the court hearing the arguments in late October.

The new Supreme Court is the most conservative for 90 years. The six justices appointed by Republican presidents and the three appointed by Democrats appeared divided along ideological lines.

The court is likely to overturn some or all of such case precedents based on sharp and skeptical questioning from the conservative justices.

During court argument, Justice Clarence Thomas asked lawyers for the universities to define "diversity". He said, "It seems to mean everything for everyone." Justice Samuel A.Alito Jr. asked what "underrepresented minority" meant.

The justices are not expected to finalize their opinions until late June or early July. If they rule that affirmative action is unconstitutional, the number of black and Latino students would be reduced in colleges and universities nationwide, particularly at elite institutions.

1 2 3 Next   >>|

Related Stories

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩色网 | 亚洲a视频在线观看 | 中文字幕――色哟哟 | 国产婷婷色一区二区三区在线 | 69av视频在线| 日本三级视频在线观看 | 欧美日本一本 | 日本三级视频在线播放 | 亚洲色图17p | 日韩精品999 | 成人午夜网 | 黄色三级免费 | 青青草在线视频免费观看 | 超碰伊人| 日本久久久久 | 欧美一区二区三区精品 | 久久久香蕉视频 | 成年人免费黄色 | aaa一区二区三区 | 成人午夜视频精品一区 | 日韩一区二区三区在线观看视频 | 日本a在线播放 | 快点使劲对白露脸叫床 | 野性的青春 | av在线激情 | 欧美黄色一级生活片 | 香蕉成人网| 欧美日韩综合 | 国产成人精品一区二区三区网站观看 | 香蕉视频在线观看免费 | 亚色综合| 日韩av一区二区三区四区 | 天堂8在线视频 | 中文字幕av专区dvd | 四虎在线免费观看 | 女人高潮特级毛片 | 午夜激情影院 | 日韩免费一级片 | 欧美自拍偷拍第一页 | 亚洲图片中文字幕 | 免费的黄色的网站 |